Grayscale image of a robotic arm in a clean, modern environment.

How to Spot Red Flags in Medical Records Before the Opposition Does

Icon representing a calendar or date selection interface.

February 20, 2026

Home
>
Blog
>
>
How to Spot Red Flags in Medical Records Before the Opposition Does
If you don’t find the red flags in your client’s records first, the defense will—and they’ll use them to weaken your case.

Is spotting red flags in medical records hard for you?

Everything looks fine until the opposition brings up a red flag you missed.

Many lawyers know the pain of reviewing thick stacks of medical records. It’s time-consuming, complex, and easy to miss critical details. But if you don’t catch red flags first, the other side will.

Don’t know how to spot red flags in medical records? Let’s explore the most common red flags and how to find them before the opposite side does.

What are Red Flags in Medical Records?

A red flag in medical records is anything that casts doubt on the credibility, consistency, or severity of the patient’s injury or condition. These red flags do not always mean someone is lying, but they suggest something is here to have a closer look.

Red flags in medical records can weaken any legal case. It can make cross-examination very tough.

How to Spot Red Flags in Medical Records?

Here’s what you need to keep an eye out for spot red flags in medical records:

Inconsistent Medical History

In one record, the patient denies any prior back pain, but a previous record shows treatment for back pain a year ago.

Any prior treatment can weaken causation analysis and make it harder to prove the new injury is from the current incident.

How to find out:

  • Ask full medical history of the plaintiff
  • Do not always rely on what the client remembers; check the records also.
  • Differentiate the old injury from the new one with timelines and expert opinion.
30–40% Case Weakening
Missed red flags can reduce claim strength by 30–40%, affecting negotiations, causation, and jury trust.

Delayed Medical Treatment

The plaintiff’s injury happened on February 1, but the first doctor visit was on March 16.

This type of delay between the injury and the first visit after the injury can create certain doubts. Opposing counsel may say “If he was really hurt, why didn’t he go to the doctor right away?”

How to find out:

  • Ask the exact reason for the delay.
  • Check for emergency room visits, urgent care, or calls to a nurse that may have been missed.

Activities That Contradict Reported Limitations

Medical records show the plaintiff can’t lift more than 7 pounds or is unable to bend, but the surveillance shows him carrying heavy boxes and moving things. Any contradictions may lead to claim denial or loss of trust by the jury.

If the defense sees this, they will argue your client is exaggerating.

How to find out:

  • Review work status notes, therapy updates, and daily activities.
  • Ask your client if they’ve been recorded or followed.
  • Prepare a strong, consistent explanation of their condition and limits.
  • Be honest and get ahead of it.

Prior Similar Injuries

Your client is filing a neck injury claim, but records show treatment for whiplash two years earlier. This allows the defense to argue that the current injury is a continuation of a pre-existing condition. That weakens causation and damages claims.

How to find out:

  • Highlight the difference in location, severity, or symptoms.
  • Ask your expert to clarify that the current condition is separate.
  • Provide a clear before-and-after timeline showing functional decline.

Gap in Treatment

The patient received treatment from February to May, after there was no recorded treatment until November.

Long gaps in treatment raise many questions. Did the condition improve? Did the patient give up on care? Or did they just stop showing up? These questions will give answers.

How to find out:

  • Review the timeline of care.
  • Identify any unexplained breaks in treatment.
  • See if there’s documentation of discharge, referrals, or missed appointments.

Seeking High Quality Medical Record Review Service?

Copy-Paste Documentation

Electronic Health Records often include repeated notes. If every visit appears identical, it may weaken the argument for ongoing symptoms or evolving care. Copy-pasted notes suggest that the care was routine or unhelpful.

How to find out:

  • Look for copy-paste language.
  • Note any lack of updated assessments.
  • Consider an independent medical examination (IME) if the records lack substance.
  • Highlight any progress notes showing change or response to treatment.

Create a “Red Flag Checklist”

To make reviews easier, create your own checklist of red flags to look for every time. This saves time, improves accuracy, and keeps your case stronger.

Sample items for your checklist:

  • Delay in treatment
  • Contradictory history
  • Gaps in care
  • Work status vs. claimed limitations
  • Prior similar injuries
  • Copy-pasted notes
  • No objective findings

Get Expert Help

As a busy attorney, you don’t have time to review every line of a thousand-page medical record.

So, how do you protect your case without spending days combing through records?

At LezDo TechMed, we provide detailed, accurate medical record reviews for law firms. We highlight red flags, track inconsistencies, and help you prepare stronger arguments.

quotes-icon

Key Red Flags Attorneys Must Catch

35%

More Causation Issues

Inconsistent histories weaken cases

30%

Credibility Risk

Delayed treatment raises suspicion

25%

Lower Settlements

Contradictory activities reduce value

Frequently Asked Questions

What are red flags in medical records?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Red flags are inconsistencies or warning signs in medical records that raise doubts about injury severity, credibility, or causation and can weaken a legal case.

Why are red flags in medical records dangerous for legal cases?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Unaddressed red flags allow opposing counsel to challenge credibility, causation, and damages, potentially reducing settlement value or harming jury trust.

How do inconsistent medical histories affect a case?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Conflicting histories—such as denying prior injuries that appear in records—can weaken causation analysis and make it harder to link injuries to the current incident.

Why does delayed medical treatment raise suspicion?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Delays between injury and first treatment can lead the defense to question injury severity and argue the condition was not serious or accident-related.

How do gaps in medical treatment weaken claims?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Long breaks in treatment may suggest recovery, lack of compliance, or exaggeration, all of which can reduce claim strength.

What are activity contradictions in medical records?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Activity contradictions occur when claimed limitations conflict with surveillance, work activity, or daily behavior, undermining credibility and damages.

Why do prior similar injuries matter in injury claims?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Prior similar injuries allow the defense to argue the condition is pre-existing, weakening causation and reducing compensation.

How do copy-pasted medical notes create problems?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Repeated, identical notes suggest routine care or lack of progress, weakening arguments for ongoing symptoms or worsening conditions.

How much can missed red flags impact a legal case?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Missed red flags can reduce claim strength by 30–40%, affecting negotiations, causation arguments, and jury perception.

How can attorneys proactively identify red flags in medical records?

Orange downward pointing arrow icon.

Attorneys can use structured checklists, analyze timelines, cross-check histories, ask targeted client questions, and seek expert medical record review support.

Final Thoughts

You may have an appealing story and a sympathetic client, but if the medical records contain red flags that go unaddressed, your case could fall apart. Think like the defense: what will they point out? What will they highlight to the jury? By identifying red flags early, you can avoid surprises at mediation or trial.

Don’t just read medical records. Analyze and ask questions. When you spot the problems first, you can turn potential weaknesses into manageable ones.

Grayscale portrait of a woman with a wide smile.

Jebisha

Jebisha Jenishofen holds an MBA in Marketing and works as a medical-legal research analyst with over five years of experience in the medical-legal field. She combines her background in literature and research to develop clear and accurate medical and legal content that supports case evaluations, insurance claims, and compliance needs. Her expertise in market research and client insights helps her connect analytical skills with strong industry knowledge in the medical-legal domain.